From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C742FC433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242690AbiDKLZI (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:25:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232540AbiDKLZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:25:07 -0400 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7740145515 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 04:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77EBCE1780 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7854C385A4; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:22:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649676170; bh=JzUaNs3tkAZ2BznjJufgJLTd7ZQAOc+lgIP4oXd/mSM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=ezp+zLPsTCD3sfeszo7rkVxNQWrkZzT1yAcrbo7nJdxZDO9cFYemhFA1FISJvaeCe cpJaDFDOWvss5T1nD1+yMLlu9NwAgYVWwO8AQ23YPa/7rCjBoFFhRAGjc/6y7e4A9A VGjjNEiQDOnQBoWiYxX00BJtU4tS8BPsXpXLJxgg= Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree To: jakub@cloudflare.com, ast@kernel.org Cc: From: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:22:39 +0200 Message-ID: <164967615922239@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 9a69e2b385f443f244a7e8b8bcafe5ccfb0866b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Sitnicki Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:43:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide remote_port is another case of a BPF context field documented as a 32-bit value in network byte order for which the BPF context access converter generates a load of a zero-padded 16-bit integer in network byte order. First such case was dst_port in bpf_sock which got addressed in commit 4421a582718a ("bpf: Make dst_port field in struct bpf_sock 16-bit wide"). Loading 4-bytes from the remote_port offset and converting the value with bpf_ntohl() leads to surprising results, as the expected value is shifted by 16 bits. Reduce the confusion by splitting the field in two - a 16-bit field holding a big-endian integer, and a 16-bit zero-padding anonymous field that follows it. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209184333.654927-2-jakub@cloudflare.com diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index a7f0ddedac1f..afe3d0d7f5f2 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -6453,7 +6453,8 @@ struct bpf_sk_lookup { __u32 protocol; /* IP protocol (IPPROTO_TCP, IPPROTO_UDP) */ __u32 remote_ip4; /* Network byte order */ __u32 remote_ip6[4]; /* Network byte order */ - __u32 remote_port; /* Network byte order */ + __be16 remote_port; /* Network byte order */ + __u16 :16; /* Zero padding */ __u32 local_ip4; /* Network byte order */ __u32 local_ip6[4]; /* Network byte order */ __u32 local_port; /* Host byte order */ diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index cb150f756f3d..f08034500813 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_sk_lookup(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kat if (!range_is_zero(user_ctx, offsetofend(typeof(*user_ctx), local_port), sizeof(*user_ctx))) goto out; - if (user_ctx->local_port > U16_MAX || user_ctx->remote_port > U16_MAX) { + if (user_ctx->local_port > U16_MAX) { ret = -ERANGE; goto out; } @@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_sk_lookup(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kat ctx.family = (u16)user_ctx->family; ctx.protocol = (u16)user_ctx->protocol; ctx.dport = (u16)user_ctx->local_port; - ctx.sport = (__force __be16)user_ctx->remote_port; + ctx.sport = user_ctx->remote_port; switch (ctx.family) { case AF_INET: diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 99a05199a806..83f06d3b2c52 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -10843,7 +10843,8 @@ static bool sk_lookup_is_valid_access(int off, int size, case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip4): case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip6[0], remote_ip6[3]): case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip6[0], local_ip6[3]): - case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port): + case offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port) ... + offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip4) - 1: case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_port): case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ingress_ifindex): bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, sizeof(__u32));