All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: maz@kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix GICR_CTLR.RWP polling" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:36:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164974177724237@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 0df6664531a12cdd8fc873f0cac0dcb40243d3e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:50:32 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix GICR_CTLR.RWP polling

It turns out that our polling of RWP is totally wrong when checking
for it in the redistributors, as we test the *distributor* bit index,
whereas it is a different bit number in the RDs... Oopsie boo.

This is embarassing. Not only because it is wrong, but also because
it took *8 years* to notice the blunder...

Just fix the damn thing.

Fixes: 021f653791ad ("irqchip: gic-v3: Initial support for GICv3")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220315165034.794482-2-maz@kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 0efe1a9a9f3b..9b6316582515 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
 	}
 }
 
-static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base)
+static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base, u32 bit)
 {
 	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
 
-	while (readl_relaxed(base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_RWP) {
+	while (readl_relaxed(base + GICD_CTLR) & bit) {
 		count--;
 		if (!count) {
 			pr_err_ratelimited("RWP timeout, gone fishing\n");
@@ -224,13 +224,13 @@ static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base)
 /* Wait for completion of a distributor change */
 static void gic_dist_wait_for_rwp(void)
 {
-	gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data.dist_base);
+	gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data.dist_base, GICD_CTLR_RWP);
 }
 
 /* Wait for completion of a redistributor change */
 static void gic_redist_wait_for_rwp(void)
 {
-	gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data_rdist_rd_base());
+	gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data_rdist_rd_base(), GICR_CTLR_RWP);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164974177724237@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.