From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: martin@strongswan.org, dsahern@kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] netfilter: Update ip6_route_me_harder to consider L3 domain" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 19:10:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165151141457238@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8ddffdb9442a9d60b4a6e679ac48d7d21403a674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:47:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: Update ip6_route_me_harder to consider L3 domain
The commit referenced below fixed packet re-routing if Netfilter mangles
a routing key property of a packet and the packet is routed in a VRF L3
domain. The fix, however, addressed IPv4 re-routing, only.
This commit applies the same behavior for IPv6. While at it, untangle
the nested ternary operator to make the code more readable.
Fixes: 6d8b49c3a3a3 ("netfilter: Update ip_route_me_harder to consider L3 domain")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter.c
index 1da332450d98..8ce60ab89015 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter.c
@@ -24,14 +24,13 @@ int ip6_route_me_harder(struct net *net, struct sock *sk_partial, struct sk_buff
{
const struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
struct sock *sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk_partial);
+ struct net_device *dev = skb_dst(skb)->dev;
struct flow_keys flkeys;
unsigned int hh_len;
struct dst_entry *dst;
int strict = (ipv6_addr_type(&iph->daddr) &
(IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL));
struct flowi6 fl6 = {
- .flowi6_oif = sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if ? sk->sk_bound_dev_if :
- strict ? skb_dst(skb)->dev->ifindex : 0,
.flowi6_mark = skb->mark,
.flowi6_uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk),
.daddr = iph->daddr,
@@ -39,6 +38,13 @@ int ip6_route_me_harder(struct net *net, struct sock *sk_partial, struct sk_buff
};
int err;
+ if (sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
+ fl6.flowi6_oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+ else if (strict)
+ fl6.flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
+ else
+ fl6.flowi6_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex(dev);
+
fib6_rules_early_flow_dissect(net, skb, &fl6, &flkeys);
dst = ip6_route_output(net, sk, &fl6);
err = dst->error;
reply other threads:[~2022-05-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165151141457238@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=martin@strongswan.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.