WTF: patch "[PATCH] selftests/landlock: Test landlock_create_ruleset(2) argument" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree?

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 6533d0c3a86ee1cc74ff37ac92ca597deb87015c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:08:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/landlock: Test landlock_create_ruleset(2) argument
 check ordering
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Add inval_create_ruleset_arguments, extension of
inval_create_ruleset_flags, to also check error ordering for
landlock_create_ruleset(2).

This is similar to the previous commit checking landlock_add_rule(2).

Test coverage for security/landlock is 94.4% of 504 lines accorging to
gcc/gcov-11.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-11-mic@digikod.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
index 21fb33581419..35f64832b869 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
@@ -97,14 +97,17 @@ TEST(abi_version)
 	ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
 }
 
-TEST(inval_create_ruleset_flags)
+/* Tests ordering of syscall argument checks. */
+TEST(create_ruleset_checks_ordering)
 {
 	const int last_flag = LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION;
 	const int invalid_flag = last_flag << 1;
+	int ruleset_fd;
 	const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
 		.handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
 	};
 
+	/* Checks priority for invalid flags. */
 	ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, invalid_flag));
 	ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
 
@@ -119,6 +122,22 @@ TEST(inval_create_ruleset_flags)
 		  landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr),
 					  invalid_flag));
 	ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+
+	/* Checks too big ruleset_attr size. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, -1, 0));
+	ASSERT_EQ(E2BIG, errno);
+
+	/* Checks too small ruleset_attr size. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 0, 0));
+	ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+	ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 1, 0));
+	ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+
+	/* Checks valid call. */
+	ruleset_fd =
+		landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
 }
 
 /* Tests ordering of syscall argument checks. */