From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com,
cong.wang@bytedance.com, zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Optimize performance of update hash-map when free is zero
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:40:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165498361355.20267.7962671859794283090.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610023308.93798-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:33:06 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>
> We encountered bad case on big system with 96 CPUs that
> alloc_htab_elem() would last for 1ms. The reason is that after the
> prealloc hashtab has no free elems, when trying to update, it will still
> grab spin_locks of all cpus. If there are multiple update users, the
> competition is very serious.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v6,1/2] bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no free elems
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/54a9c3a42d92
- [v6,2/2] selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_map benchmark
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/89eda98428ce
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-11 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 2:33 [PATCH v6 0/2] Optimize performance of update hash-map when free is zero Feng zhou
2022-06-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no free elems Feng zhou
2022-06-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_map benchmark Feng zhou
2022-06-11 21:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165498361355.20267.7962671859794283090.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.