From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1655478.UaWFlMFlxQ@merkaba> References: <2133270.BvWHEGSr0T@merkaba> <87d1i5gfar.fsf@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87d1i5gfar.fsf@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jani Nikula Cc: Intel Gfx Mailing List , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org QW0gTWl0dHdvY2gsIDkuIE5vdmVtYmVyIDIwMTYsIDExOjQyOjM2IENFVCBzY2hyaWViIEphbmkg TmlrdWxhOgo+ID4gKkhvd2V2ZXIqLCBJIGdvdCBhIHNvZnQgZnJlZXplIGFuZCBhIGhhcmQgZnJl ZXplICh3ZWxsIGFmdGVyIGFib3V0IGEKPiA+IG1pbnV0ZSBJIGdhdmUgdXAgYW5kIHJlYm9vdGVk IGJ5IHByZXNzaW5nIHBvd2VyIGJ1dHRvbiBsb25nIGVub3VnaCB0bwo+ID4gZm9yY2VmdWxseSBz d2l0Y2ggb2ZmIHRoZSBsYXB0b3ApIHdoZW4gcGxheWluZyBQbGFuZVNoaWZ0IHVzaW5nCj4gPiBk cm0taW50ZWwtZml4ZXMgYnJhbmNoLgo+ID4gCj4gPiBVbmZvcnR1bmF0ZWx5IEkgaGF2ZSBubyBm dXJ0aGVyIHRpbWUgdG8gZGVidWcgYW55IG9mIHRoaXMgd2VlaywgYnV0IGl0Cj4gPiBzZWVtcyBu b3QgYWxsIGZpeGVzIGFyZSB0aGVyZSBhcmUgcmVhZHkgZm9yIG5leHQgc3RhYmxlIGtlcm5lbC4K PiAKPiBDdXJyZW50IGRybS1pbnRlbC1maXhlcyBpcyBqdXN0IHNpeCBjb21taXRzIG9uIHRvcCBv ZiAtcmM0LCBhbmQgaXQncwo+IHZlcnkgaGFyZCBmb3IgbWUgdG8gYmVsaWV2ZSBhbnkgb2YgdGhv c2Ugd291bGQgY2F1c2UgdGhlIHN5bXB0b21zIHlvdQo+IHNlZS4gSSBwcmVzdW1lIHRoZSBwcm9i bGVtLCB3aGF0ZXZlciBpdCBpcywgaXMgYWxyZWFkeSBpbiAtcmM0Lgo+IAo+IFRoYXQsIG9mIGNv dXJzZSwgaXMgbm90IGEgaGFwcHkgdGhpbmcgcGVyIHNlLCBidXQgcGxlYXNlIGRvbid0IGJsb2Nr IHRoZQo+IGN1cnJlbnQgYmF0Y2ggb2YgZml4ZXMgYnkgbWFraW5nIHVuc3Vic3RhbnRpYXRlZCBj bGFpbXMuIFBsZWFzZSBkbyBmaWxlCj4gYSBidWcgYWJvdXQgdGhhdCBpc3N1ZSBvdmVyIGF0IFsx XSBzbyB3ZSBkb24ndCBoaWphY2sgdGhpcyB0aHJlYWQuCgpZb3UgYXJlIHJpZ2h0LiBJIGhhdmUg bm8gY29tcGFyaXNvbiB3aXRoIDQuOS1yYzQgZHVlIHRvIHRoZSBncmFwaGljcyBnbGl0Y2hlcyAK SSBoYWQgaW4gaXQuCgotLSAKTWFydGluCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCkludGVsLWdmeCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKSW50ZWwtZ2Z4QGxpc3RzLmZy ZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL2ludGVsLWdmeAo= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753411AbcKIJ77 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 04:59:59 -0500 Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:50305 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751203AbcKIJ75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 04:59:57 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald To: Jani Nikula Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel Gfx Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1655478.UaWFlMFlxQ@merkaba> User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.8.0-1-amd64; KDE/5.27.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87d1i5gfar.fsf@intel.com> References: <2133270.BvWHEGSr0T@merkaba> <87d1i5gfar.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2016, 11:42:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > *However*, I got a soft freeze and a hard freeze (well after about a > > minute I gave up and rebooted by pressing power button long enough to > > forcefully switch off the laptop) when playing PlaneShift using > > drm-intel-fixes branch. > > > > Unfortunately I have no further time to debug any of this week, but it > > seems not all fixes are there are ready for next stable kernel. > > Current drm-intel-fixes is just six commits on top of -rc4, and it's > very hard for me to believe any of those would cause the symptoms you > see. I presume the problem, whatever it is, is already in -rc4. > > That, of course, is not a happy thing per se, but please don't block the > current batch of fixes by making unsubstantiated claims. Please do file > a bug about that issue over at [1] so we don't hijack this thread. You are right. I have no comparison with 4.9-rc4 due to the graphics glitches I had in it. -- Martin