From: Steven Seeger <steven.seeger@nasa.gov>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] userspace absolute timer value
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:14:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1658062.jOZnPEAolN@wirbelwind> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151223184341.GB3877@hermes.click-hack.org>
On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 19:43:41 Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> If I understand correctly, your problem is that struct timespec
> tv_sec member has 32 bits. Well, I am afraid there is not much we
> can do about that (I heard mainline has a plan to switch to a new
> timespec with a 64 bits tv_sec, but I do not know how much of that
> plan has been implemented).
Yes, this is exactly my problem.
>
> Can you not call clock_settime to set a wallclock offset which will
> at least allow CLOCK_REALTIME to behave as expected ?
The issue is with the testsuite/latency app. It uses
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) and adds a millisecond to that value and then
uses that as the absolute start time of the latency thread. All calculates are
based off this primed value.
There really is no reason for my board to come up with such a ridiculous
timebase value. I have no idea why it does that. I set it to 0 very early in
the kernel boot cycle and it fixed the issue. (This board is loaded via jtag so
there may be some weirdness there.) This fix will last 136 years, right? :) My
point was just that if the timebase is not a reasonable value I think this bug
will manifest.
IMHO there is no benefit to allowing us to say we want some task to start in
the year 500,000,000,000 so there isn't really a need for such large numbers
in this one use-case.
Your idea of a fix is essentially correct, and should work across all systems.
However, I was trying to run the standard latency app which should also work
across all systems! :)
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 18:05 [Xenomai] userspace absolute timer value Steven Seeger
2015-12-23 18:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2015-12-23 19:14 ` Steven Seeger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-15 1:19 Steven Seeger
2015-12-22 16:59 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1658062.jOZnPEAolN@wirbelwind \
--to=steven.seeger@nasa.gov \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.