From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value()
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:30:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165840661389.30255.12097142217891066504.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtZ+LpgPADm7BeEd@kili>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:49:34 +0300 you wrote:
> The code here is supposed to take a signed int and store it in a
> signed long long. Unfortunately, the way that the type promotion works
> with this conditional statement is that it takes a signed int, type
> promotes it to a __u32, and then stores that as a signed long long.
> The result is never negative.
>
> Fixes: d90ec262b35b ("libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c6018fc6e7b6
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-19 9:49 [PATCH] libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value() Dan Carpenter
2022-07-19 17:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-19 18:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-19 23:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-21 12:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165840661389.30255.12097142217891066504.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.