From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] virtio-net: fix the race between refill work and close
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:30:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165892501318.3549.7310176827653095517.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725072159.3577-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:21:59 +0800 you wrote:
> We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
> of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() can schedule the refill work then can
> re-enable the NAPI that leads to use-after-free [1].
>
> Since the work can enable NAPI, we can't simply disable NAPI before
> calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(). So fix this by introducing a
> dedicated boolean to control whether or not the work could be
> scheduled from NAPI.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [V6] virtio-net: fix the race between refill work and close
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/5a159128faff
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-25 7:21 [PATCH V6] virtio-net: fix the race between refill work and close Jason Wang
2022-07-25 7:21 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-25 7:23 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-25 7:23 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-25 7:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-25 7:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-25 9:39 ` Xuan Zhuo
2022-07-25 9:39 ` Xuan Zhuo
2022-07-27 12:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165892501318.3549.7310176827653095517.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.