From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexandr.lobakin@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, oliver.sang@intel.com,
yury.norov@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iommu/vt-d: avoid invalid memory access via" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:50:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166056422684133@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b0b0b77ea611e3088e9523e60860f4f41b62b235 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:38:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: avoid invalid memory access via
node_online(NUMA_NO_NODE)
KASAN reports:
[ 4.668325][ T0] BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in dmar_parse_one_rhsa (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:226 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/nodemask.h:415 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:497)
[ 4.676149][ T0] Read of size 8 at addr 1fffffff85115558 by task swapper/0/0
[ 4.683454][ T0]
[ 4.685638][ T0] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3-00004-g0e862838f290 #1
[ 4.694331][ T0] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5018D-FN4T/X10SDV-8C-TLN4F, BIOS 1.1 03/02/2016
[ 4.703196][ T0] Call Trace:
[ 4.706334][ T0] <TASK>
[ 4.709133][ T0] ? dmar_parse_one_rhsa (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:226 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/nodemask.h:415 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:497)
after converting the type of the first argument (@nr, bit number)
of arch_test_bit() from `long` to `unsigned long`[0].
Under certain conditions (for example, when ACPI NUMA is disabled
via command line), pxm_to_node() can return %NUMA_NO_NODE (-1).
It is valid 'magic' number of NUMA node, but not valid bit number
to use in bitops.
node_online() eventually descends to test_bit() without checking
for the input, assuming it's on caller side (which might be good
for perf-critical tasks). There, -1 becomes %ULONG_MAX which leads
to an insane array index when calculating bit position in memory.
For now, add an explicit check for @node being not %NUMA_NO_NODE
before calling test_bit(). The actual logics didn't change here
at all.
[0] https://github.com/norov/linux/commit/0e862838f290147ea9c16db852d8d494b552d38d
Fixes: ee34b32d8c29 ("dmar: support for parsing Remapping Hardware Static Affinity structure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 592c1e1a5d4b..70d324c9894a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int dmar_parse_one_rhsa(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, void *arg)
if (drhd->reg_base_addr == rhsa->base_address) {
int node = pxm_to_node(rhsa->proximity_domain);
- if (!node_online(node))
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
drhd->iommu->node = node;
return 0;
reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166056422684133@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.