All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:51:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com> (raw)

 
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, at 03:18AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

>Peter W�chtler <pwaechtler@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> While it's more secure to not dump core at all if the program has
>>  switched euid, it's also very unpractical. Since only programs 
>>  started from root, being setuid root or have CAP_SETUID it's far 
>>  more practical to dump as root.root mode 600. This is the bahavior 
>>  of Solaris.
>> 
>>  The current implementation does not ensure that an existing core
>>  file is only readable as root, i.e. after dumping the ownership 
>>  and mode is unchanged.
>> 
>>  Besides mm->dumpable to avoid recursive core dumps, on setuid files 
>>  the dumpable flag still prevents a core dump while seteuid & co will
>>  result in a core only readable as root.
>
>It's a bit sad to add another function call level to sys_unlink() simply
>because the core dumping code needs it.
>
>Is it not possible to call sys_unlink() directly from there?  Something like
>
>long kernel_unlink(const char *name)
>{
>	mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
>	long ret;
>
>	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
>	ret = sys_unlink(name);
>	set_fs(old_fs);
>	return ret;
>}	

And you're asking me? ;)
While getname() has a check for user/kernelspace - do you really
care about "the overhead" for a function call level with 1 argument?
Uhm, probably if you even care to write this..

What is the cost for switching the segments?
But I agree that sys_unlink should be the fast call and dumping core
is the exception :)

would fastcall do_unlink() help? I guess the arg is then passed in a
register



             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22  8:51 Peter Waechtler [this message]
2004-04-22  8:55 ` [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 15:35 Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 17:22   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23  7:46 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23  7:16 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 17:10 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-23 19:05   ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23  7:14 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22  9:40 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22  9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 19:43   ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 19:53     ` Chris Wright
2004-04-22 20:05     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-21 19:20 Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22  1:18 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com \
    --to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.