From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD4AE01443 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2012 06:05:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="157116587" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.123]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2012 06:05:10 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Gary Thomas Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:05:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1665284.yNCLAGgIcC@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-25-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <21623227.IdSUJJ2Hr3@helios> References: <4FE220B8.2080903@mlbassoc.com> <4FE45BE3.3090200@mlbassoc.com> <21623227.IdSUJJ2Hr3@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: New warning X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:05:11 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 22 June 2012 14:01:39 Paul Eggleton wrote: > Rather than ${MACHINE}.patch, the traditional way to do this is to have a > generic name for the file and then use a MACHINE-named subdirectory within > your BSP layers to define the machine-specific version. You can always make > the dummy patch not apply or specifically check for some aspect added by > the dummy in do_configure. (Assuming you use a dummy file that is - with the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE fix I suggested this is not necessary; this was from an earlier edit of my message.) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre