FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Possible dependencies:

81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling")
dfe8aec4520b ("btrfs: add a btrfs_block_group_root() helper")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 81d5d61454c365718655cfc87d8200c84e25d596 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:02:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling

Currently there are two corner cases not handling compat RO flags
correctly:

- Remount
  We can still mount the fs RO with compat RO flags, then remount it RW.
  We should not allow any write into a fs with unsupported RO flags.

- Still try to search block group items
  In fact, behavior/on-disk format change to extent tree should not
  need a full incompat flag.

  And since we can ensure fs with unsupported RO flags never got any
  writes (with above case fixed), then we can even skip block group
  items search at mount time.

This patch will enhance the unsupported RO compat flags by:

- Reject read-write remount if there are unsupported RO compat flags

- Go dummy block group items directly for unsupported RO compat flags
  In fact, only changes to chunk/subvolume/root/csum trees should go
  incompat flags.

The latter part should allow future change to extent tree to be compat
RO flags.

Thus this patch also needs to be backported to all stable trees.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 53c44c52cb79..e7b5a54c8258 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -2164,7 +2164,16 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 	int need_clear = 0;
 	u64 cache_gen;
 
-	if (!root)
+	/*
+	 * Either no extent root (with ibadroots rescue option) or we have
+	 * unsupported RO options. The fs can never be mounted read-write, so no
+	 * need to waste time searching block group items.
+	 *
+	 * This also allows new extent tree related changes to be RO compat,
+	 * no need for a full incompat flag.
+	 */
+	if (!root || (btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(info->super_copy) &
+		      ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP))
 		return fill_dummy_bgs(info);
 
 	key.objectid = 0;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 7291e9d67e92..eb0ae7e396ef 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -2117,6 +2117,15 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto restore;
 		}
+		if (btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
+		    ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+		"can not remount read-write due to unsupported optional flags 0x%llx",
+				btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
+				~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto restore;
+		}
 		if (fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 0) {
 			ret = -EACCES;
 			goto restore;