From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] keys: make procfiles per-user-namespace Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:41:04 +0000 Message-ID: <16728.1235565664@redhat.com> References: <20090223204041.GA31626@us.ibm.com> <20090109225313.GB15599@us.ibm.com> <20090109225208.GA15252@us.ibm.com> <5296.1234522990@redhat.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090223204041.GA31626@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, lkml , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Hmmm... I wonder if we can do better by making the file position indicate > > the key ID rather than being a count of the number of keys read. It might > > make this cleaner. > > file position? as in the result of lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR)? > > I don't understand what you're suggesting. Currently the file position on /proc/keys indicates the number of keys that have been read. It is incremented by 1 for each key read, irrespective of the length of the line that was read for that key. We could, instead, map file positions to key IDs, and skip any file positions that don't actually map to an extant key. David