All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:21:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <167284210313124@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Possible dependencies:

2820e5d0820a ("block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 2820e5d0820ac4daedff1272616a53d9c7682fd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:12:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices

dd_finish_request() tests if the per prio fifo_list is not empty to
determine if request dispatching must be restarted for handling blocked
write requests to zoned devices with a call to
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(). While simple, this implementation has
2 problems:

1) Only the priority level of the completed request is considered.
   However, writes to a zone may be blocked due to other writes to the
   same zone using a different priority level. While this is unlikely to
   happen in practice, as writing a zone with different IO priorirites
   does not make sense, nothing in the code prevents this from
   happening.
2) The use of list_empty() is dangerous as dd_finish_request() does not
   take dd->lock and may run concurrently with the insert and dispatch
   code.

Fix these 2 problems by testing the write fifo list of all priority
levels using the new helper dd_has_write_work(), and by testing each
fifo list using list_empty_careful().

Fixes: c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124021208.242541-2-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 5639921dfa92..36374481cb87 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -789,6 +789,18 @@ static void dd_prepare_request(struct request *rq)
 	rq->elv.priv[0] = NULL;
 }
 
+static bool dd_has_write_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+	struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
+	enum dd_prio p;
+
+	for (p = 0; p <= DD_PRIO_MAX; p++)
+		if (!list_empty_careful(&dd->per_prio[p].fifo_list[DD_WRITE]))
+			return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Callback from inside blk_mq_free_request().
  *
@@ -828,9 +840,10 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
 		blk_req_zone_write_unlock(rq);
-		if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_WRITE]))
-			blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
+
+		if (dd_has_write_work(rq->mq_hctx))
+			blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
 	}
 }
 


             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04 14:21 gregkh [this message]
2023-01-05  4:07 ` [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices Damien Le Moal
2023-01-05 11:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-05  4:08 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=167284210313124@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.