From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266320AbUBERYj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:24:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266385AbUBERYj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:24:39 -0500 Received: from virgo.i-cable.com ([203.83.111.75]:27275 "HELO virgo.i-cable.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266320AbUBERYh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:24:37 -0500 Message-ID: <167301c3ec0d$4d8508c0$b8560a3d@kyle> From: "Kyle" To: "Bas Mevissen" Cc: References: <164601c3ec06$be8bd5a0$b8560a3d@kyle> <40227C20.80404@basmevissen.nl> Subject: Re: ICH5 with 2.6.1 very slow Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 01:27:17 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes they are PATA, I expect something like 40-50MB/s, now my much slower Celeron 1.3T with 80GB/2M perform better than my ICH5! Kyle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bas Mevissen" To: "Kyle" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:23 AM Subject: Re: ICH5 with 2.6.1 very slow > Kyle wrote: > > > Problem with ICH5? > > I read the list web, so please CC my email, thanks. > > > > P4 2.6G HT, 2GB Ram, ICH5, WD250GB/8M x 2 (md raid 1), kernel 2.6.1 > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.14 seconds =882.89 MB/sec > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.14 seconds = 29.93 MB/sec > > > > Celeron 1.3T, 1GB Ram, SIS630/5513, WD80GB/2M x 2 (md raid 1), kernel 2.6.1 > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.24 seconds =103.08 MB/sec > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.83 seconds = 35.00 MB/sec > > > > Celeron 2.5G, 512MB Ram, i845/ICH4, WD120GB/8M x 2 (md raid 1), redhat > > kernel 2.4.20 > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.35 seconds =365.71 MB/sec > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.38 seconds = 46.38 MB/sec > > > > Is that a parallel IDE? I own a S-ATA IDE (also WD) with an ICH5. That > performs around 45-50MB/sec with 2.6.1. I've never tried 2.4.xx on it. > > Bas. > > >