All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"mobil@wodkahexe.de" <mobil@wodkahexe.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc4 No local APIC present or hardware disabled
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:08:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16765.2298.953135.524930@alkaid.it.uu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0410241615350.14448@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>

Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
 > > I agree with Alan that accusing the BIOS of being buggy is unwarranted.
 > 
 >  I disagree.  If the firmware performs any actions on hardware without
 > asking the OS for permission, it *must* be prepared for it to be in any
 > possible state and handle it correctly, including any transitional states
 > (as it does respect spinlocks).  Otherwise it's buggy.

But in this case the BIOS explicitly disabled the local APIC. It may
have a legitimate reason for doing so (e.g. old #SMM code), so if the
Linux kernel overrides that disablement and things break, it really is
the kernel's fault not the BIOS'.

 > patch-2.6.9-lapic-7

I'm Ok with this patch.

/Mikael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-25 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-12 17:54 2.6.9-rc4 No local APIC present or hardware disabled mobil
2004-10-12 16:11 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-10-12 16:15 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-10-13 23:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-10-14 10:52   ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-10-14 22:27     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-10-15 12:26       ` Alan Cox
2004-10-15 13:53       ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-10-24 15:44         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-10-24 15:11           ` Alan Cox
2004-10-25 14:08           ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2004-10-14 11:59   ` mobil
2004-10-14 21:25     ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16765.2298.953135.524930@alkaid.it.uu.se \
    --to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=mobil@wodkahexe.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.