From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: andi.shyti@linux.intel.com, andrzej.hajda@intel.com,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@intel.com,
janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com, nirmoy.das@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] Patch "drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:47:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168000764822222@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation
to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-active-fix-missing-debug-object-activation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From e92eb246feb9019b0b137706c934b8891cdfe3c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:29:14 +0100
Subject: drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
commit e92eb246feb9019b0b137706c934b8891cdfe3c2 upstream.
debug_active_activate() expected ref->count to be zero
which is not true anymore as __i915_active_activate() calls
debug_active_activate() after incrementing the count.
v2: No need to check for "ref->count == 1" as __i915_active_activate()
already make sure of that(Janusz).
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6733
Fixes: 04240e30ed06 ("drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active callback")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230313114613.9874-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit bfad380c542438a9b642f8190b7fd37bc77e2723)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ static void debug_active_init(struct i91
static void debug_active_activate(struct i915_active *ref)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&ref->tree_lock);
- if (!atomic_read(&ref->count)) /* before the first inc */
- debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
+ debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
}
static void debug_active_deactivate(struct i915_active *ref)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nirmoy.das@intel.com are
queue-6.1/drm-i915-gt-perform-uc-late-init-after-probe-error-i.patch
queue-6.1/drm-i915-print-return-value-on-error.patch
queue-6.1/drm-i915-active-fix-missing-debug-object-activation.patch
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-28 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-28 12:47 gregkh [this message]
2023-03-28 22:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Patch "drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168000764822222@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.