From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6763C77B6C for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229539AbjDGWaV (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:30:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229462AbjDGWaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:30:20 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B2A93C2 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 15:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52239612B7 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9871C4339B; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1680906618; bh=2uRcEh+dwTrN7t+jcVBRLO5RqQBFkX2bNHWtH7aVVKo=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=LbzFHR9RlV2moTQpsPnN9TAYC5D5eiljlxYs6+IGpg33liX00dEGnxCrAdkdcZRqd 2YgIgpa30dgNdTzzsrALw+2HnmZVjBfuo4n1gpnZpik/T6QnLoVfqL2bZB/dYkG9lN /JyWsjTjgyOsyinqzxb4F5WLgHXcKytjUqZvnUyH3s+xD6qnQf96VSFfHBDOW3iw2g Uh303JNjkCXwxCe7qIVXxyIkmSY7kaZid42beSRtpGRXG4Z52hOOluc9XhYpVab9m2 +GSRIniBc3dPNIxRd6UefC3b9/CRP48AJ2ekGHWafZyFVNGBULGMl/ZZNkY2p15hro UUGU2ojejQhBQ== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D029C4167B; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES event for get_branch_snapshot From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <168090661857.32399.12892629908764782223.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 22:30:18 +0000 References: <20230407190130.2093736-1-song@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230407190130.2093736-1-song@kernel.org> To: Song Liu Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko : On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 12:01:30 -0700 you wrote: > perf_event with type=PERF_TYPE_RAW and config=0x1b00 turned out to be not > reliable in ensuring LBR is active. Thus, test_progs:get_branch_snapshot is > not reliable in some systems. Replace it with PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES > event, which gives more consistent results. > > Signed-off-by: Song Liu > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES event for get_branch_snapshot https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ebf5212bf04 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html