All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: lirc program type should not require SYS_CAP_ADMIN
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 20:30:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <168176342060.32012.3458485345693041514.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZD0ArKpwnDBJZsrE@gofer.mess.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:17:48 +0100 you wrote:
> Make it possible to load lirc program type with just CAP_BPF. There is
> nothing exceptional about lirc programs that means they require
> SYS_CAP_ADMIN.
> 
> In order to attach or detach a lirc program type you need permission to
> open /dev/lirc0; if you have permission to do that, you can alter all
> sorts of lirc receiving options. Changing the IR protocol decoder is no
> different.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] bpf: lirc program type should not require SYS_CAP_ADMIN
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/69a8c792cd95

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17  8:17 [PATCH v2] bpf: lirc program type should not require SYS_CAP_ADMIN Sean Young
2023-04-17 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=168176342060.32012.3458485345693041514.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=sean@mess.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.