Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: handle another corner case in getsockopt

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:53:37 -0700 you wrote:
> Martin reports another case where getsockopt EFAULTs perfectly
> valid callers. Let's fix it and also replace EFAULT with
> pr_info_ratelimited. That should hopefully make this place
> less error prone.
> 
> First 2 patches fix the issue with NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS and
> test it.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/6] bpf: Don't EFAULT for getsockopt with optval=NULL
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/00e74ae08638
  - [bpf-next,2/6] selftests/bpf: Verify optval=NULL case
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/833d67ecdc5f
  - [bpf-next,3/6] bpf: Don't EFAULT for {g,s}setsockopt with wrong optlen
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,4/6] selftests/bpf: Update EFAULT {g,s}etsockopt selftests
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,5/6] selftests/bpf: Correctly handle optlen > 4096
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,6/6] bpf: Document EFAULT changes for sockopt
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html