From: borg@uu3.net
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re[2]: ipt_limit patch for iptables-1.3.1 and linux-2.4.22
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:35:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16937451772.20051223213523@uu3.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051223201951.GA28723@linuxace.com>
Okey.. So you saying that my system is broken?
I have patched kernel + iptables.. installed new
kernel + iptables.. but userland is not updated..
It it bad?
I know it is when there are major changes in kernel
so userspace cannot see them. But in that case I think
its not a big problem since this is only used in iptables?
I know that its necessary to rebuild world when new kernel
comes... but I think, this is not a case in that situation.
Or am I wrong again?
Thx for your patience,
Borg
----- Original Message -----
From: kernel@linuxace.com
To: borg@uu3.net
Date: 23-12-2005, 21:19
Subject: ipt_limit patch for iptables-1.3.1 and linux-2.4.22
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:13:01PM +0100, borg@uu3.net wrote:
> Well.. patching only kernel or only userland is pointless indeed.
> I still dont understand "brakes userspace"
> I assume that we patch both iptables + kernel.
new kernel + old userspace = broken
old kernel + new userspace = broken
> Where is the problem then?
comprehension
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-23 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-23 13:12 ipt_limit patch for iptables-1.3.1 and linux-2.4.22 borg
2005-12-23 13:40 ` m.innocenti
2005-12-23 15:43 ` Re[2]: " borg
2005-12-23 19:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-12-23 20:13 ` Re[2]: " borg
2005-12-23 20:19 ` Phil Oester
2005-12-23 20:35 ` borg [this message]
2005-12-23 20:57 ` Phil Oester
2005-12-27 9:21 ` m.innocenti
2005-12-24 6:27 ` Patrick Schaaf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16937451772.20051223213523@uu3.net \
--to=borg@uu3.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.