From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Subject: Re[2]: Reiser4 O_DIRECT
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 23:49:00 +0200
Message-ID: <1695540869.20050521234900@wp.pl>
References: <1116525192.29446.5.camel@zion>
 <1116578526.3532.463.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
Reply-To: Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-24099-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1116578526.3532.463.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello Vladimir,

Friday, May 20, 2005, 10:42:06 AM, you wrote:
> reiser4 has not O_DIRECT support yet.
> It will be added when the below are done:
> 1. reiser4 does not crash in our internal stress tests
I remember Hans saying that r4 is so stable that the developers themselves
can not find any more bugs.

Anyway, best of luck and greetings to the project developers.

I guess the true stabilization will come once r4 is in the kernel
as an experimental fs. Only then the number of users will grow
rapidly. But you already know that, so...

Keep on rocking dudes!

--
Best Regards,
Maciej