From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] pwm_backlight: Add deferred probe support
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:27:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1697155.mRXUHrIIe9@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343140823-13754-5-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Simon,
On Saturday 25 August 2012 15:57:12 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:40:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > If the PWM instance is not available yet at probe time, request a
> > deferred probe.
> >
> > A better way to fix might be to create a PWM subsystem (possibly
> > integrated into the GPIO subsystem) to support generic PWM objects, and
> > make sure the subsystem gets initialized first.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I am wondering if you have had a chance to review this change.
> I believe that it is a pre-requisite for work that Laurent has
> done to enable the backlight on the Armadillo 800 EVA board.
The PWM core now returns -EPROBE_DEFER if pwm_get() or pwm_request() can't
find the requested device, so this patch isn't needed anymore.
> If the change is ok I am happy to take it through
> my shmobile tree if that makes life easier for you.
>
> Below is an updated version of the patch which applies on top of 3.6-rc3.
>
> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> pwm_backlight: Add deferred probe support
>
> If the PWM instance is not available yet at probe time, request a
> deferred probe.
>
> A better way to fix might be to create a PWM subsystem (possibly
> integrated into the GPIO subsystem) to support generic PWM objects, and
> make sure the subsystem gets initialized first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c index 995f016..cc71f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n");
> ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
> + if (ret = -ENODEV)
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> goto err_alloc;
> }
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 14:40 [PATCH v2 4/6] pwm_backlight: Add deferred probe support Laurent Pinchart
2012-08-25 6:57 ` Simon Horman
2012-09-19 18:27 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-09-20 1:52 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1697155.mRXUHrIIe9@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.