From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: avoid unnecessary conflicts over rte_config file Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:31:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1697764.L6jCD5RFoR@xps13> References: <20161012212917.10760-1-ouster@cs.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Van Haaren, Harry" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , dev@dpdk.org To: John Ousterhout Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F8256AB for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:31:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b75so143460608lfg.3 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-10-13 09:20, John Ousterhout: > Hi Harry, > > But, given the existence of the --file-prefix option, isn't it already > unsafe for Collectd to check only for .rte_config? If it's important for > other programs to be able to find the config files, it seems to me that a > more robust mechanism is needed than the current one. +1 And the default location of the file should respect the Linux standards, e.g. .config/dpdk/...