All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	haoluo@google.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, hsinweih@uci.edu, houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Check map->usercnt after timer->timer is assigned
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:00:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169890482495.9002.6880714745373814049.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231030063616.1653024-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:36:16 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> 
> When there are concurrent uref release and bpf timer init operations,
> the following sequence diagram is possible. It will break the guarantee
> provided by bpf_timer: bpf_timer will still be alive after userspace
> application releases or unpins the map. It also will lead to kmemleak
> for old kernel version which doesn't release bpf_timer when map is
> released.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3] bpf: Check map->usercnt after timer->timer is assigned
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/fd381ce60a2d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-30  6:36 [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Check map->usercnt after timer->timer is assigned Hou Tao
2023-11-02  6:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169890482495.9002.6880714745373814049.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=hsinweih@uci.edu \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.