All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>
Cc: sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
	hkelam@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	wojciech.drewek@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:00:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170074082435.27332.7452962954462258378.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121165624.3664182-1-sumang@marvell.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:26:24 +0530 you wrote:
> It is possible to add a ntuple rule which would like to direct packet to
> a VF whose number of queues are greater/less than its PF's queue numbers.
> For example a PF can have 2 Rx queues but a VF created on that PF can have
> 8 Rx queues. As of today, ntuple rule will reject rule because it is
> checking the requested queue number against PF's number of Rx queues.
> As a part of this fix if the action of a ntuple rule is to move a packet
> to a VF's queue then the check is removed. Also, a debug information is
> printed to aware user that it is user's responsibility to cross check if
> the requested queue number on that VF is a valid one.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4aa1d8f89b10

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-23 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-21 16:56 [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF Suman Ghosh
2023-11-22  9:11 ` Wojciech Drewek
2023-11-23  9:46 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-23 12:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170074082435.27332.7452962954462258378.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    --cc=sumang@marvell.com \
    --cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.