All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: wintera@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	kgraul@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 13/13] net/smc: implement {at|de}tach_dmb interfaces of loopback-ism
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 21:24:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1702214654-32069-14-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1702214654-32069-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>

This implements attach_dmb and detach_dmb interfaces of loopback-ism.
The DMB won't be unregistered by loopback-ism until no sndbuf is
attached to it.

Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 net/smc/smc_loopback.h |   4 ++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 057ea6a..909c069 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
 	}
 	dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
 	dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
+	refcount_set(&dmb_node->refcnt, 1);
 
 again:
 	/* add new dmb into hash table */
@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
 	}
 	hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
 	write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	atomic_inc(&ldev->dmb_cnt);
 	SMC_LO_STAT_DMBS_INC(ldev);
 
 	dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
@@ -233,8 +235,8 @@ static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
 	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
 	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
 
-	/* remove dmb from hash table */
-	write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	/* find dmb from hash table */
+	read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
 		if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
 			dmb_node = tmp_node;
@@ -242,9 +244,18 @@ static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
 		}
 	}
 	if (!dmb_node) {
-		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+		read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+	read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	/* wait for peer sndbuf to detach from this dmb */
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&dmb_node->refcnt))
+		wait_event(ldev->dmbs_release,
+			   !refcount_read(&dmb_node->refcnt));
+
+	/* remove dmb from hash table */
+	write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 	hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
 	write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 
@@ -253,6 +264,66 @@ static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
 	kfree(dmb_node);
 	SMC_LO_STAT_DMBS_DEC(ldev);
 
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ldev->dmb_cnt))
+		wake_up(&ldev->ldev_release);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_attach_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
+{
+	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+	/* find dmb_node according to dmb->dmb_tok */
+	read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
+		if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
+			dmb_node = tmp_node;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!dmb_node) {
+		read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&dmb_node->refcnt))
+		/* the dmb is being unregistered, but has
+		 * not been removed from the hash table.
+		 */
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* provide dmb information */
+	dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
+	dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
+	dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
+	dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
+	dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_detach_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 token)
+{
+	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+	/* find dmb_node according to dmb->dmb_tok */
+	read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, token) {
+		if (tmp_node->token == token) {
+			dmb_node = tmp_node;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!dmb_node) {
+		read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dmb_node->refcnt))
+		wake_up_all(&ldev->dmbs_release);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -288,7 +359,15 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
 {
 	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
 	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
-
+	struct smc_connection *conn;
+
+	if (!sf) {
+		/* Since ghost sndbuf shares the same memory region
+		 * with peer DMB, there is no need to 'transfer' data
+		 * from sndbuf to peer DMB.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+	}
 	read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
 		if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
@@ -305,14 +384,10 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
 	memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
 	SMC_LO_STAT_TX_BYTES(ldev, size);
 
-	if (sf) {
-		struct smc_connection *conn =
-			smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
-
-		if (conn && !conn->killed) {
-			SMC_LO_STAT_RX_BYTES(ldev, size);
-			smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
-		}
+	conn = smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+	if (conn && !conn->killed) {
+		SMC_LO_STAT_RX_BYTES(ldev, size);
+		smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -345,6 +420,8 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
 	.query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid,
 	.register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb,
 	.unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb,
+	.attach_dmb = smc_lo_attach_dmb,
+	.detach_dmb = smc_lo_detach_dmb,
 	.add_vlan_id = smc_lo_add_vlan_id,
 	.del_vlan_id = smc_lo_del_vlan_id,
 	.set_vlan_required = smc_lo_set_vlan_required,
@@ -426,12 +503,18 @@ static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
 	smc_lo_generate_id(ldev);
 	rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
 	hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht);
+	atomic_set(&ldev->dmb_cnt, 0);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ldev->dmbs_release);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ldev->ldev_release);
+
 	return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev);
 }
 
 static void smc_lo_dev_exit(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
 {
 	smcd_lo_unregister_dev(ldev);
+	if (atomic_read(&ldev->dmb_cnt))
+		wait_event(ldev->ldev_release, !atomic_read(&ldev->dmb_cnt));
 }
 
 static void smc_lo_dev_release(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
index ad0feaa..df6c252 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct smc_lo_dmb_node {
 	u32 sba_idx;
 	void *cpu_addr;
 	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+	refcount_t refcnt;
 };
 
 struct smc_lo_dev_stats64 {
@@ -45,9 +46,12 @@ struct smc_lo_dev {
 	u16 chid;
 	struct smcd_gid local_gid;
 	struct smc_lo_dev_stats64 __percpu *stats;
+	atomic_t dmb_cnt;
 	rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS);
 	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LO_DMBS_HASH_BITS);
+	wait_queue_head_t dmbs_release;
+	wait_queue_head_t ldev_release;
 };
 
 #define SMC_LO_STAT_SUB(ldev, key, val) \
-- 
1.8.3.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-10 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-10 13:24 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/13] net/smc: implement loopback-ism used by SMC-D Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] net/smc: improve SMC-D device dump for virtual ISM Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/13] net/smc: decouple specialized struct from SMC-D DMB registration Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/13] net/smc: introduce virtual ISM device loopback-ism Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/13] net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/13] net/smc: implement some unsupported " Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/13] net/smc: implement DMB-related " Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/13] net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/13] net/smc: introduce loopback-ism runtime switch Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/13] net/smc: introduce loopback-ism statistics attributes Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/13] net/smc: introduce operations to {at|de}tach ghost sndbuf to peer DMB Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/13] net/smc: attach or detach " Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/13] net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf is mapped " Wen Gu
2023-12-10 13:24 ` Wen Gu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1702214654-32069-14-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.