From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lilium.sigma-star.at ([109.75.188.150]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fDVDc-0007kg-TR for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 13:21:31 +0000 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: Question about process.c Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 15:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1708862.d7yAjbcJLQ@blindfold> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Anton Ivanov Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-um@lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2018, 15:01:54 CEST schrieb Anton Ivanov: > Hi all, hi Richard, > > I have a question - is it really necessary to pass a "force" flag to a > tlb flush before doing a fork (in process.c)? Where exactly? Thanks, //richard -- sigma star gmbh - Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 6 - 6020 Innsbruck - Austria ATU66964118 - FN 374287y _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um