From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, idosch@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org,
jiri@resnulli.us, lucien.xin@gmail.com, edwin.peer@broadcom.com,
amcohen@nvidia.com, pctammela@mojatatu.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] rtnetlink: fix error logic of IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS writing back
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 03:50:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170917862804.28712.16209474962340682302.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227121128.608110-1-linma@zju.edu.cn>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:11:28 +0800 you wrote:
> In the commit d73ef2d69c0d ("rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks
> IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length"), an adjustment was made to the old loop logic
> in the function `rtnl_bridge_setlink` to enable the loop to also check
> the length of the IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE attribute. However, this adjustment
> removed the `break` statement and led to an error logic of the flags
> writing back at the end of this function.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] rtnetlink: fix error logic of IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS writing back
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/743ad091fb46
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 12:11 [PATCH net v2] rtnetlink: fix error logic of IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS writing back Lin Ma
2024-02-27 12:31 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-27 12:38 ` Lin Ma
2024-02-27 12:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-02-29 3:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170917862804.28712.16209474962340682302.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=edwin.peer@broadcom.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linma@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.