All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	kuniyu@amazon.com, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, leitao@debian.org,
	alexander@mihalicyn.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 03:10:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170969462846.24513.2351243182107643239.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304212928.make.772-kees@kernel.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon,  4 Mar 2024 13:29:31 -0800 you wrote:
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ff73f8344e58

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 21:29 [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy() Kees Cook
2024-03-05 13:23 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-06  3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170969462846.24513.2351243182107643239.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.