diff for duplicates of <1709826.dVqTms8REP@diego> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index c8e7ffa..0f3a77a 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2015, 10:21:59 schrieb Boris Brezillon: > + > + enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; > + -> + if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf) +> + if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf) > + pwm->state.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; the inactive setting does not affect the polarity of the running pwm, only what @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ would suggest changing this like - enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; + enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE; -- if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf) +- if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf) + if ((val & enable_conf) != enable_conf) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 380ef33..ae6f85c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,8 +2,27 @@ "ref\01435738921-25027-14-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com\0" "From\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 13/15] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update\0" - "Date\0Wed, 01 Jul 2015 21:48:31 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:48:31 +0200\0" "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "Cc\0Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>" + Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> + linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org + Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> + linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org + Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> + Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> + Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> + Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> + Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> + Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> + Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> + Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> + Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> + linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org + Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> + Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> + Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> + " linux-leds@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Boris,\n" @@ -34,7 +53,7 @@ "> +\n" "> +\tenable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE;\n" "> +\n" - "> +\tif ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf)\n" + "> +\tif ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf)\n" "> +\t\tpwm->state.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;\n" "\n" "the inactive setting does not affect the polarity of the running pwm, only what \n" @@ -45,7 +64,7 @@ "- enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE;\n" "+ enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE;\n" " \n" - "- if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf)\n" + "- if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf)\n" "+ if ((val & enable_conf) != enable_conf)\n" " \n" "\n" @@ -58,4 +77,4 @@ "\n" Heiko -e5da108ce457ebbbaebaa057d0e5c01743d7b4fae074bb87ad708a78ade63fc4 +aca3691b5ed6716db2e6b0aadac9480778287b8933d905ba487c98b4bb4689fb
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index c8e7ffa..0f3a77a 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2015, 10:21:59 schrieb Boris Brezillon: > + > + enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; > + -> + if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf) +> + if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf) > + pwm->state.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; the inactive setting does not affect the polarity of the running pwm, only what @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ would suggest changing this like - enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; + enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE; -- if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf) +- if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf) + if ((val & enable_conf) != enable_conf) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 380ef33..f329f18 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ "ref\01435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com\0" "ref\01435738921-25027-14-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com\0" - "From\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 13/15] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update\0" - "Date\0Wed, 01 Jul 2015 21:48:31 +0000\0" + "From\0heiko@sntech.de (Heiko St\303\274bner)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 13/15] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update\0" + "Date\0Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:48:31 +0200\0" "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ "> +\n" "> +\tenable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE;\n" "> +\n" - "> +\tif ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf)\n" + "> +\tif ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf)\n" "> +\t\tpwm->state.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;\n" "\n" "the inactive setting does not affect the polarity of the running pwm, only what \n" @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ "- enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE;\n" "+ enable_conf = PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE;\n" " \n" - "- if ((val & enable_conf) = enable_conf)\n" + "- if ((val & enable_conf) == enable_conf)\n" "+ if ((val & enable_conf) != enable_conf)\n" " \n" "\n" @@ -58,4 +58,4 @@ "\n" Heiko -e5da108ce457ebbbaebaa057d0e5c01743d7b4fae074bb87ad708a78ade63fc4 +cd24eeb5ae33696419d1702d09fa59b4aee76d58915698581d61b5e04aff93a6
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.