From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
jolsa@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, sdf@google.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de,
naresh.kamboju@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: pack struct bpf_fib_lookup
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:00:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171227164323.30433.13590004188099763511.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403123303.1452184-1-aspsk@isovalent.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:33:03 +0200 you wrote:
> The struct bpf_fib_lookup is supposed to be of size 64. A recent commit
> 59b418c7063d ("bpf: Add a check for struct bpf_fib_lookup size") added
> a static assertion to check this property so that future changes to the
> structure will not accidentally break this assumption.
>
> As it immediately turned out, on some 32-bit arm systems, when AEABI=n,
> the total size of the structure was equal to 68, see [1]. This happened
> because the bpf_fib_lookup structure contains a union of two 16-bit
> fields:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: pack struct bpf_fib_lookup
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f91717007217
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 12:33 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: pack struct bpf_fib_lookup Anton Protopopov
2024-04-03 12:37 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-03 13:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-04-03 17:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-03 20:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-03 21:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-04-03 22:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-04 7:56 ` Anton Protopopov
2024-04-04 9:04 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-04 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171227164323.30433.13590004188099763511.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aspsk@isovalent.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.