From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mustafa.ismail@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
leon@kernel.org, mkalderon@marvell.com, aelior@marvell.com,
j.vosburgh@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
kadlec@netfilter.org, roopa@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Set scope explicitly in ip_route_output().
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:21:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171257890235.8472.12307217868929913978.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f3c874fb825cdc030f729d2e48e6f45f3e3527f.1712347466.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:05:00 +0200 you wrote:
> Add a "scope" parameter to ip_route_output() so that callers don't have
> to override the tos parameter with the RTO_ONLINK flag if they want a
> local scope.
>
> This will allow converting flowi4_tos to dscp_t in the future, thus
> allowing static analysers to flag invalid interactions between
> "tos" (the DSCP bits) and ECN.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] ipv4: Set scope explicitly in ip_route_output().
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ec20b2830093
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 20:05 [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Set scope explicitly in ip_route_output() Guillaume Nault
2024-04-08 10:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-08 12:21 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2024-04-11 9:36 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171257890235.8472.12307217868929913978.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=aelior@marvell.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mkalderon@marvell.com \
--cc=mustafa.ismail@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=shiraz.saleem@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.