From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, bristot@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, edumazet@google.com, frederic@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, longman@redhat.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking.
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171927543522.12295.9957726701377633700.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620132727.660738-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:21:50 +0200 you wrote:
> Disabling bottoms halves acts as per-CPU BKL. On PREEMPT_RT code within
> local_bh_disable() section remains preemtible. As a result high prior
> tasks (or threaded interrupts) will be blocked by lower-prio task (or
> threaded interrupts) which are long running which includes softirq
> sections.
>
> The proposed way out is to introduce explicit per-CPU locks for
> resources which are protected by local_bh_disable() and use those only
> on PREEMPT_RT so there is no additional overhead for !PREEMPT_RT builds.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v9,net-next,01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/07e4fd4c0592
- [v9,net-next,02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c5bcab755822
- [v9,net-next,03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/43d7ca2907cb
- [v9,net-next,04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bdacf3e34945
- [v9,net-next,05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/585aa621af6c
- [v9,net-next,06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ebad6d033479
- [v9,net-next,07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c67ef53a88db
- [v9,net-next,08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit per task.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ecefbc09e8ee
- [v9,net-next,09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*().
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a8760d0d1497
- [v9,net-next,10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b22800f9d3b1
- [v9,net-next,11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3414adbd6a6a
- [v9,net-next,12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d1542d4ae4df
- [v9,net-next,13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/78f520b7bbe5
- [v9,net-next,14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/401cb7dae813
- [v9,net-next,15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context on PREEMPT_RT.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3f9fe37d9e16
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 13:21 [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 10:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-25 0:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171927543522.12295.9957726701377633700.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.