From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Sunyang Wu <sunyang.wu@jaguarmicro.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] ethdev: keep promiscuous/allmulti value before enabling
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:28:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17193600.geO5KgaWL5@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <KL1PR0601MB556788BFC98F8A212F2F6921905DA@KL1PR0601MB5567.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
21/07/2025 14:13, Sunyang Wu:
> Hi, Thomas:
> Thanks for your note. The main purpose of this modification is to align the handling logic with the "disable" functions,
> aiming to enhance the overall consistency and maintainability of the code.
>
> Previously, the handling of failure scenarios in the "enable" related logic differed from that in the "disable" functions.
> With this adjustment, both will behave more uniformly in exceptional cases, which should reduce potential confusion
> during future development or maintenance caused by inconsistent logic.
In this case, please send a v2 explaining the intent is to align with disable functions,
and saying there is no behavior change.
> 21/07/2025 13:51, Sunyang Wu:
> > The values of the promiscuous and allmulticast variables are set after
> > calling the driver, according to the return value.
> >
> > Fixes: 400d75818266 ("ethdev: check device promiscuous state")
> > de5ccf0775ae ("ethdev:do nothing if all-multicast mode is applied
> > again")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunyang Wu <sunyang.wu@jaguarmicro.com>
> [...]
> > diag = dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable(dev);
> > - dev->data->promiscuous = (diag == 0) ? 1 : 0;
> > + if (diag == 0)
> > + dev->data->promiscuous = 1;
>
> I remember seeing this strange behavior of resetting the value if failed.
> And it is done differently in the "disable" functions.
>
> But it is not so wrong, because if it was enabled, the function returns early.
> So the value changes only if it is successful.
>
> What is the issue you observe?
> Is it a rework to make the code easier to understand?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 11:51 [PATCH] ethdev: keep promiscuous/allmulti value before enabling Sunyang Wu
2025-07-21 12:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-07-21 12:13 ` 回复: " Sunyang Wu
2025-07-21 12:28 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17193600.geO5KgaWL5@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=sunyang.wu@jaguarmicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.