From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>, Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"aconole@redhat.com" <aconole@redhat.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:42:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17245202.EenqpPWYet@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR18MB2284B2DCD4FB8BEFEA8AE9B1D8529@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not definitive.
Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2?
What is the intent?
12/05/2021 15:15, Akhil Goyal:
> Hi Ciara,
>
> I see that CI is reporting one error in autotest. Can you please check if it is because of your patchset?
>
> 9/96 DPDK:fast-tests / cycles_autotest FAIL 1.42s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
> 12:33:15 DPDK_TEST=cycles_autotest MALLOC_PERTURB_=44 /home/jenkins-local/jenkins-agent/workspace/Ubuntu18.04-Unit-Test-DPDK/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test '-l 0-3' --file-prefix=cycles_autotest
> ----------------------------------- output -----------------------------------
> stdout:
> RTE>>cycles_autotest
>
> delay_us is not accurate: too long
> Test Failed
>
>
> Regards,
> Akhil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 5:07 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com; Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>;
> > aconole@redhat.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Anoob Joseph
> > <anoobj@marvell.com>; ruifeng.wang@arm.com; asomalap@amd.com;
> > ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com; g.singh@nxp.com; roy.fan.zhang@intel.com;
> > Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
> > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The current crypto unit test framework is not granular enough to
> > accurately track unit test results. This is caused by one testcase
> > in a suite actually running multiple testcases, but only returning
> > one result.
> >
> > The approach taken in this patchset allows a test suite have a
> > list of sub-testsuites, and/or a list of testcases as previously used.
> > The unit test suite runner can then recursively iterate and run the
> > sub-testsuites, until it reaches a suite with testcases,
> > and it then runs each testcase as it had done previously.
> > In the case of a testsuite with both testcases and sub-testsuites,
> > the testcases are executed first before iterating through the
> > sub-testsuites.
> >
> > By allowing this further breakdown into sub-testsuites,
> > a refactor of the crypto unit tests solves the issue of inaccurate
> > reporting, as sub-testsuites can be used in place of the testcases
> > that had multiple testcases hidden on a sub level.
> > The blockcipher tests previously had these hidden testcases,
> > but are now sub-testsuites that are dynamically created and added to a
> > parent test suite, allowing for each testcase status to be reported
> > directly to the runner.
> > The cryptodev test suite is broken down into smaller suites that are
> > used as sub-testsuites, which allows for more flexibility choosing which
> > sub-testsuites should run for the current device.
> > The introduction of sub-testsuites also allows for more precise
> > setup/teardown functions, that can check the capabilities required to
> > run its testcases.
> >
> > For example, when running the cryptodev_aesni_mb_autotest,
> > the parent Cryptodev Test Suite is executed.
> > Various sub-testsuites are added to the parent test suite, such as
> > the static suites of testcases that were once in the cryptodev_testsuite,
> > and blockcipher suites.
> > The unit test runner can then run the Cryptodev parent test suite,
> > which in turn will run the sub-testsuites.
> >
> > The user is now required to create vdevs via EAL commandline args,
> > this is no longer done within the test app for crypto autotests.
> >
> > Documentation will need to be added at a later stage,
> > adding to the test document that isn't yet merged. [1]
> >
> > [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > 3A__patchwork.dpdk.org_project_dpdk_patch_20210309155757.615536-
> > 2D1-2Daconole-
> > 40redhat.com_&d=DwIDAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=DnL7Si2wl_PR
> > wpZ9TWey3eu68gBzn7DkPwuqhd6WNyo&m=XItKx7UnOATOiVC3kRLlV3Woh
> > rLeZbmlqShu_py452U&s=BpOMigsNnvWMV739-
> > fMxEvVERJieNSnfnnmZdiMLMJg&e=
> >
> >
> > v4:
> > - Fixed some return value bugs related to patch 4.
> > - Rebased onto main.
> > v3:
> > - Added support for a testsuite having both a list of testcases,
> > and a list of sub-testsuites.
> > - Replaced PMD based parent testsuites with a cryptodev testsuite
> > used by all autotests, with the exception of scheduler autotest.
> > - Setup functions were added for all sub-testsuites, within which
> > required capability support is checked.
> > - The setup functions no longer create vdevs if needed,
> > this must be done by the user when running the test.
> > - Patch added to standardise return values for skipped testcases.
> > v2:
> > - Added macro in place of testcase/testsuite loops.
> > - Added more detail in the summary output.
> > - Moved testcase counts to the testsuite structure.
> > - Flattened testsuite structure to remove union.
> > - Added patch for fix of blockcipher test return value.
> > - Squashed release note into last patch.
> >
> > Ciara Power (7):
> > app/test: refactor of unit test suite runner
> > test: introduce parent testsuite format
> > test/crypto: refactor to use sub-testsuites
> > test/crypto: replace unsupported with skipped
> > test/crypto: move testsuite params to header file
> > test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped
> > test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite
> >
> > app/test/test.c | 176 +-
> > app/test/test.h | 23 +-
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 2333 ++++++++++++++----------
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.h | 32 +
> > app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 111 +-
> > app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c | 423 ++++-
> > app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.h | 12 +-
> > app/test/test_ipsec.c | 32 +-
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst | 5 +
> > 9 files changed, 2004 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 11:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] app/test: refactor of unit test suite runner Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test: introduce parent testsuite format Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/crypto: refactor to use sub-testsuites Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/crypto: replace unsupported with skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/crypto: move testsuite params to header file Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite Ciara Power
2021-05-12 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework Akhil Goyal
2021-05-12 15:42 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-05-12 16:00 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-05-12 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-12 16:06 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-05-13 13:28 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17245202.EenqpPWYet@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.