From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic()
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 21:30:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173429823099.3585316.12907966837487758399.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212165546.879567-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:55:45 +0200 you wrote:
> Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the
> CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports).
>
> The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly
> from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling
> with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask,
> but rather a single port index.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/2d5df3a680ff
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-15 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 16:55 [PATCH net] net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-13 12:13 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-15 21:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173429823099.3585316.12907966837487758399.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.