diff for duplicates of <17357.1328781673@redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index b548f22..f17ad54 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org wrote: +Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just > checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ebb2730..5faa6a9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,22 +1,21 @@ - "ref\022934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu\0" "ref\020120208122905.8902.65762.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk\0" - "ref\022934.1328745230-+bZmOdGhbsPr6rcHtW+onFJE71vCis6O@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "ref\022934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu\0" + "From\0David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate \"Authentication service unavailable\"\0" "Date\0Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:13 +0000\0" - "To\0Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org\0" - "Cc\0dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" - jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org - keyrings-6DNke4IJHB0gsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org - linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " libc-alpha-9JcytcrH/bA+uJoB2kUjGw@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu\0" + "Cc\0dhowells@redhat.com" + jmorris@namei.org + keyrings@linux-nfs.org + linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org + linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org + linux-api@vger.kernel.org + " libc-alpha@sourceware.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org wrote:\n" + "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:\n" "\n" "> Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just\n" "> checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to \"fix\" the\n" @@ -27,4 +26,4 @@ "\n" David -60e48738a871b441e255158cedd507b9b1aeee99d75bce4acf98e1b3c1a8361c +4e58446cc9f3ad25e24b674bc10d23321b53afeb78a7ad6db6df6a3b1a8a3ad5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.