From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5EA84A01 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736998222; cv=none; b=d8vp/0NwL7xkwqrYeieghgiU2qbwdDcsM2qUCFo8xaxIzsskehlODcvxy8KvsQrrd1ysIevUSNirvFFIIYyXZx52XHHsILwRhNyPQT79Fkh0ubUDx3gMb4gOhMyCo5DkaBeTWyKOo1Rp0nJ8vuqA73gwv6MqVOfHdohagbnIoSk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736998222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rn+YU2oewC8w3uMZZNQXxpiwzO+2pOp3niNY0ZOExvA=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=I8NsIqutOVamVmI8oiEcfvBzRQmfxdMa3mkb2RVOOx4qxfJ9dDIC3y15mpZrrLctoPQspPmgZfbsT6zfujlTKHZDd3GO9Zi5jx+psGT0QFGOedBBMIT9KwpX/fg8Y5x6Hv8eiNWeAOoayXpNxjVa3qiMI3OPK+1C7QRcWwQPtlA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ufl0O4uB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ufl0O4uB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E199C4CED1; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:30:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736998222; bh=rn+YU2oewC8w3uMZZNQXxpiwzO+2pOp3niNY0ZOExvA=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=ufl0O4uBto6gtlBbSOeXG4PGOSlJvBnikMJTvQhXjbJ/UojmQx1en2AHzbI6Vfg73 T95DFD/jh9EtGQYSKFgmlE7Q0YLgPLsHxJaK9pLbv1XvUVK2eSbh3zLvJs6SAZhqrc WnJi5dcbMbAnTQDIFI4vg7Q4ixZ6xINh9Lvl2N5AcgHBvqtQMiurR6NPvuFj3YQRXD fTYzhefLMTsE0i69zt1E4043kE2zdeP+qnJVESm2/2ymA/LUB7uonCFCUkyTDssL8G D+oSlgyP6P8+ifxw5I0wyHx2/MfbRBy4lKcOE0lzZ98+mqoZILLVLjdR/B9LdUwxeo i8y5U555Z+cHg== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CB7380AA5F; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/5] net: reduce RTNL pressure in unregister_netdevice() From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <173699824504.995574.8048482828230619557.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:30:45 +0000 References: <20250114205531.967841-1-edumazet@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20250114205531.967841-1-edumazet@google.com> To: Eric Dumazet Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 20:55:26 +0000 you wrote: > One major source of RTNL contention resides in unregister_netdevice() > > Due to RCU protection of various network structures, and > unregister_netdevice() being a synchronous function, > it is calling potentially slow functions while holding RTNL. > > I think we can release RTNL in two points, so that three > slow functions are called while RTNL can be used > by other threads. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v3,net-next,1/5] net: expedite synchronize_net() for cleanup_net() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0734d7c3d93c - [v3,net-next,2/5] net: no longer assume RTNL is held in flush_all_backlogs() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8a2b61e9e879 - [v3,net-next,3/5] net: no longer hold RTNL while calling flush_all_backlogs() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cfa579f66656 - [v3,net-next,4/5] net: reduce RTNL hold duration in unregister_netdevice_many_notify() (part 1) https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ae646f1a0bb9 - [v3,net-next,5/5] net: reduce RTNL hold duration in unregister_netdevice_many_notify() (part 2) https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/83419b61d187 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html