From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>, Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: add missing locking around taking dentry fid list
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:35:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1738699.kjPCCGL2iY@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240521122947.1080227-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org>
On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 2:29:46 PM CEST Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Fix a use-after-free on dentry's d_fsdata fid list when a thread
> lookups a fid through dentry while another thread unlinks it:
I guess that's "looks up". :)
> UAF thread:
> refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
> p9_fid_get linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:262
> v9fs_fid_find+0x236/0x280 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:129
> v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid linux/fs/9p/fid.c:181
> v9fs_fid_lookup+0xbf/0xc20 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:314
> v9fs_vfs_getattr_dotl+0xf9/0x360 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c:400
> vfs_statx+0xdd/0x4d0 linux/fs/stat.c:248
>
> Freed by:
> p9_client_clunk+0xb0/0xe0 linux/net/9p/client.c:1456
That line number looks weird.
> p9_fid_put linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:278
> v9fs_dentry_release+0xb5/0x140 linux/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c:55
> v9fs_remove+0x38f/0x620 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:518
> vfs_unlink+0x29a/0x810 linux/fs/namei.c:4335
>
> The problem is that d_fsdata was not accessed under d_lock, because
> d_release() normally is only called once the dentry is otherwise no
> longer accessible but since we also call it explicitly in v9fs_remove
> that lock is required:
> move the hlist out of the dentry under lock then unref its fids once
> they are no longer accessible.
>
> Fixes: 154372e67d40 ("fs/9p: fix create-unlink-getattr idiom")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Meysam Firouzi
> Reported-by: Amirmohammad Eftekhar
> Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
> ---
> fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
> index f16f73581634..01338d4c2d9e 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
> @@ -48,12 +48,17 @@ static int v9fs_cached_dentry_delete(const struct dentry *dentry)
> static void v9fs_dentry_release(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> struct hlist_node *p, *n;
> + struct hlist_head head;
>
> p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS, " dentry: %pd (%p)\n",
> dentry, dentry);
> - hlist_for_each_safe(p, n, (struct hlist_head *)&dentry->d_fsdata)
> +
> + spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + hlist_move_list((struct hlist_head *)&dentry->d_fsdata, &head);
> + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +
> + hlist_for_each_safe(p, n, &head)
> p9_fid_put(hlist_entry(p, struct p9_fid, dlist));
> - dentry->d_fsdata = NULL;
> }
I'm not sure if that works out. So you are moving the list from dentry to a
local variable. But if you look at v9fs_fid_find() [fs/9p/fid.c#123] it reads
dentry->d_fsdata (twice) and holds it as local variable before taking a
lock. So the lock in v9fs_fid_find() should happen earlier, no?
>
> static int v9fs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 12:29 [PATCH] 9p: add missing locking around taking dentry fid list Dominique Martinet
2024-05-22 14:35 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2024-05-22 17:25 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-05-23 8:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2024-05-23 9:27 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-05-23 10:05 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2024-05-23 11:38 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1738699.kjPCCGL2iY@silver \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.