From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "net: stmmac: Specify hardware capability value when FIFO size isn't specified"
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:00:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173883964070.1434316.3945736866379293001.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1tfeyR-003YGJ-Gb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:57:47 +0000 you wrote:
> This reverts commit 8865d22656b4, which caused breakage for platforms
> which are not using xgmac2 or gmac4. Only these two cores have the
> capability of providing the FIFO sizes from hardware capability fields
> (which are provided in priv->dma_cap.[tr]x_fifo_size.)
>
> All other cores can not, which results in these two fields containing
> zero. We also have platforms that do not provide a value in
> priv->plat->[tr]x_fifo_size, resulting in these also being zero.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] Revert "net: stmmac: Specify hardware capability value when FIFO size isn't specified"
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/2a64c96356c8
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 12:57 [PATCH net] Revert "net: stmmac: Specify hardware capability value when FIFO size isn't specified" Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-06 8:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-02-06 10:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-06 10:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-02-06 9:25 ` Steven Price
2025-02-06 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173883964070.1434316.3945736866379293001.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.