From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, yangzhenze@bytedance.com,
wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get/setsockopt to tos not take effect when TCP over IPv4 via INET6 API
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:48:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173d3b06-57ed-4e2e-9034-91b99f41512b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+ZsktuirATK0nhUmJu+TiqB9Kbozh+HhmCiP3qdnW3Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/23/24 6:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:53 AM Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>>
>> when TCP over IPv4 via INET6 API, bpf_get/setsockopt with ipv4 will
>> fail, because sk->sk_family is AF_INET6. With ipv6 will success, not
>> take effect, because inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops is ipv6_mapped and
>> use ip_queue_xmit, inet_sk(sk)->tos.
>>
>> So bpf_get/setsockopt needs add the judgment of this case. Just check
>> "inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops == &ipv6_mapped".
>>
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408152034.lw9Ilsj6-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2: Addressed comments from kernel test robot
>> - Fix compilation error
>> Details in here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/202408152058.YXAnhLgZ-lkp@intel.com/T/
>>
>> include/net/tcp.h | 2 ++
>> net/core/filter.c | 6 +++++-
>> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 6 ++++++
>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
>> index 2aac11e7e1cc..ea673f88c900 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
>> @@ -493,6 +493,8 @@ struct request_sock *cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
>> struct tcp_options_received *tcp_opt,
>> int mss, u32 tsoff);
>>
>> +bool is_tcp_sock_ipv6_mapped(struct sock *sk);
>> +
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF)
>> struct bpf_tcp_req_attrs {
>> u32 rcv_tsval;
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index ecf2ddf633bf..02a825e35c4d 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -5399,7 +5399,11 @@ static int sol_ip_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
>> char *optval, int *optlen,
>> bool getopt)
>> {
>> - if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET)
>> + if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET
>> +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6)
>> + && !is_tcp_sock_ipv6_mapped(sk)
>> +#endif
>> + )
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> This does not look right to me.
>
> I would remove the test completely.
>
> SOL_IP socket options are available on AF_INET6 sockets just fine.
Good point on the SOL_IP options.
The sk could be neither AF_INET nor AF_INET6. e.g. the bpf_get/setsockopt
calling from the bpf_lsm's socket_post_create). so the AF_INET test is still needed.
Adding "&& sk->sk_family != AF_INET6" should do. From ipv6_setsockopt, I think
it also needs to consider the "sk->sk_type != SOCK_RAW".
Please add a test in the next re-spin.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 8:53 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get/setsockopt to tos not take effect when TCP over IPv4 via INET6 API Feng zhou
2024-08-23 13:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-23 18:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-08-23 18:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-27 8:08 ` [External] " Feng Zhou
2024-09-13 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-14 2:19 ` Feng Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173d3b06-57ed-4e2e-9034-91b99f41512b@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
--cc=yangzhenze@bytedance.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.