From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35EA6C021A4 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References :Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KHkdpvcvae+XlM9B1Tac9R/7CjGL7hglrxAd0qzIPes=; b=uBhvBpvKn2lq+l6kTL4UCmBMlq Mo3BqRufKLjJghUlD+D1R5LCrNW2h3egFCbhag6DdjYs5bQpkEnCzJQTy3DUpToH3wbk57qH9fpHo JiBXylvgVSC83F3h6MolZfm24gX+8p4pCykhKZ9H9V7oafqTNRegVDFFp8UBNlQn/eUpDhuJPEBlL 8z+TblBXDztCNMMgKqlY8VYdA/aQWPFuHw4QGs1LcmqeqHwCKGwY3/l6f7ObYlZJkSwAx453oX3qi pZbTglmdnZqRQZbK51RA+Dz/faeIUGqoKhft09Op4HeMLTRtUNvSy2qZuLJPWWWFhN5/YsKA373l7 IeRRa7xA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tmgzB-0000000FNbZ-25kx; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:31:37 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tmgxg-0000000FNGj-2wNp for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0435C6D4C; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC08C4AF09; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740436202; bh=o3/XUGQL0m+SzquU2ZDcO4lPV6KEAziuUL08AurUYbE=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=qGn/0RpawzHOsnFvI+rH6yVY8sEZBQ4Ru9LrvwomnSMOBM7gbURtsNY9Tltn1QPmO 7b4pV2JXHvEvlBzcG0GyAS17NEYI9ssMVLZdBocr77Hkrm5k7gQbEEVLaAu7SvxW1/ yTiGqcWzIszCb+0rVsvn4BrBdeONccFpI69Yk+rDPB05jmJNtAk0D43Z/pLcbaUdl4 Af6dWoKh9cva+nTOa6RA4ORrWVuwIJvsBa6ziNpmn9hL8tHtMdkI03cCT36xZ2lF9Y 4kfbRDe+YPyR1bd7yqQ7gbnk2MCWvLagTJkx0DATywvCPBs/muZq/qqLtMeaOBHncE //vufIbOmc8fA== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D6F380CEDD; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: Correct usage of maximum queue number macros From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <174043623374.3631570.5317337904130972259.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:33 +0000 References: <20250221051818.4163678-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> In-Reply-To: <20250221051818.4163678-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> To: Kunihiko Hayashi Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, chenhuacai@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250224_143004_783991_3A67A830 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:18:18 +0900 you wrote: > The maximum numbers of each Rx and Tx queues are defined by > MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES and MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES respectively. > > There are some places where Rx and Tx are used in reverse. There is no > issue when the Tx and Rx macros have the same value, but should correct > usage of macros for maximum queue number to keep consistency and prevent > unexpected mistakes. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v2] net: stmmac: Correct usage of maximum queue number macros https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/352bc4513ec3 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html