From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] yet another test tool
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17438.51347.702261.525919@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441DD89A.4000501@domain.hid>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> (...)As Xenomai does not support hard-RT signal delivery yet (...)
This is the next feature missing to the POSIX skin. I would like to
implement this, but I am not sure which way to go :
- either, if it is possible, getting Linux signals services to run in
every domain at Adeos level, by replacing spinlocks with spinlocks_hw
and such kind of tricks;
- or adding a generic service at the adeos layer (a hook called when
returning to user-space), building a generic user-space signals
service at the nucleus level, and finally building all posix signals
services on top of this.
The first approach guarantees the best integration with Linux, but
potentially add sections in Linux that are not preemptible by any
Xenomai skin. With the second approach, all services related to signals
have to be reimplemented plus some shortcuts to have standard user-space
tools such as "kill" working.
>
> What do you think, is it worth including as a POSIX counterpart for
> testsuite/latency?
There are a few details that I do not like about this tool, but we may
take it, and fix the details later.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-19 22:18 [Xenomai-core] yet another test tool Jan Kiszka
2006-03-20 8:20 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-03-20 15:21 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2006-03-20 16:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-03-20 19:10 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-03-20 21:13 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-03-21 17:36 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-03-22 21:57 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-03-20 17:20 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-03-20 17:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-03-20 17:50 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17438.51347.702261.525919@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.