From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
kuniyu@amazon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it, paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it,
ahabdels.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 01:10:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174614824249.3123530.9494554975799967680.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429132453.31605-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:24:53 +0200 you wrote:
> Recent updates to the locking mechanism that protects IPv6 routing tables
> [1] have affected the SRv6 networking subsystem. Such changes cause
> problems with some SRv6 Endpoints behaviors, like End.B6.Encaps and also
> impact SRv6 counters.
>
> Starting from commit 169fd62799e8 ("ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCADDRT and
> RTM_NEWROUTE."), the inet6_rtm_newroute() function no longer needs to
> acquire the RTNL lock for creating and configuring IPv6 routes and set up
> lwtunnels.
> The RTNL lock can be avoided because the ip6_route_add() function
> finishes setting up a new route in a section protected by RCU.
> This makes sure that no dev/nexthops can disappear during the operation.
> Because of this, the steps for setting up lwtunnels - i.e., calling
> lwtunnel_build_state() - are now done in a RCU lock section and not
> under the RTNL lock anymore.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/14a0087e7236
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 13:24 [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup Andrea Mayer
2025-04-29 15:22 ` David Ahern
2025-05-02 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174614824249.3123530.9494554975799967680.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=ahabdels.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it \
--cc=stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.