From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: Warn with __bpf_trap() kfunc maybe due to uninitialized variable
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 17:40:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174836763425.1722871.5370662019575930191.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250523205316.1291136-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 23 May 2025 13:53:16 -0700 you wrote:
> Marc Suñé (Isovalent, part of Cisco) reported an issue where an
> uninitialized variable caused generating bpf prog binary code not
> working as expected. The reproducer is in [1] where the flags
> “-Wall -Werror” are enabled, but there is no warning as the compiler
> takes advantage of uninitialized variable to do aggressive optimization.
> Such optimization results in a verification log:
> last insn is not an exit or jmp
> User still needs to take quite some time to figure out what is
> the root cause.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/3] bpf: Remove special_kfunc_set from verifier
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d848bba68034
- [bpf-next,v5,2/3] bpf: Warn with __bpf_trap() kfunc maybe due to uninitialized variable
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f95695f2c465
- [bpf-next,v5,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests with __bpf_trap() kfunc
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/92de53d247df
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-27 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 20:53 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: Warn with __bpf_trap() kfunc maybe due to uninitialized variable Yonghong Song
2025-05-23 20:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] bpf: Remove special_kfunc_set from verifier Yonghong Song
2025-05-23 20:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] bpf: Warn with __bpf_trap() kfunc maybe due to uninitialized variable Yonghong Song
2025-05-23 20:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests with __bpf_trap() kfunc Yonghong Song
2025-05-27 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-26 21:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: Warn with __bpf_trap() kfunc maybe due to uninitialized variable Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-27 17:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174836763425.1722871.5370662019575930191.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.