From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ42s-0004MI-Pv for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:06:02 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2012 07:52:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,523,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="200632960" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.26]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2012 07:53:01 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1750245.JB55VjOTAz@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.1 (Linux/3.2.0-31-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-webserver][PATCH 0/6] Add meta-webserver X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:06:03 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 02 October 2012 16:40:55 Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 01-10-12 18:14, Paul Eggleton schreef: > > So finally I have got this into a working state; apologies for the delay. > > There were a number of issues affecting cross-compilation as well as some > > problems with the initial configuration; these should now be addressed. > > We may wish to look at a more standard directory layout for Apache as the > > default one doesn't seem to be used by most distributions; we can look at > > this later - for now let's get the recipes out there so people can try > > them out. > > > > I know there are a few people waiting to submit additional recipes for > > this layer and I expect we will also want to look at moving some > > web-server related recipes from meta-oe into here at some point in the > > near future. > > How does this compare to meta-networking? It's separate; this focuses just on web-based items (on the server side). I'm not sure how much it will actually grow but you can imagine in the extreme case we could end up with a number of web servers, several standalone web admin interfaces, a bunch of web frameworks and related recipes for each of the latter. All of that would bloat out meta-networking a bit too much, hence this separate layer. I did send an RFC for this a couple of months ago, although the scope has been refined a little since then: http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg26071.html Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre