From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHxaO-0002eE-4h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:27:48 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 06:18:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="87809443" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.50]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 06:18:27 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:18:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1750426.snX9VXDpzX@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.0.0-17-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1487451.qaDevSNUCm@helios> References: <1333402513-26781-1-git-send-email-andrea.adami@gmail.com> <1487451.qaDevSNUCm@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev: generalize the check in touchscreen rule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:27:48 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 11 April 2012 14:15:57 Paul Eggleton wrote: > FWIW, I can report that with a patch to the rule such as this > one Just to clarify, I meant Andrea's patch to the udev rule, not the NACKed kernel patch. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre