From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 05:00:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175074120875.3399614.10605130442249512213.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619140603.148942-1-jmarchan@redhat.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:06:01 +0200 you wrote:
> The second argument of bpf_sysctl_get_name() helper is a pointer to a
> buffer that is being written to. However that isn't specify in the
> prototype. Until commit 37cce22dbd51a ("bpf: verifier: Refactor helper
> access type tracking") that mistake was hidden by the way the verifier
> treated helper accesses. Since then, the verifier, working on wrong
> infromation from the prototype, can make faulty optimization that
> would had been caught by the test_sysctl selftests if it was run by
> the CI.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,1/2] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/2eb7648558a7
- [v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Convert test_sysctl to prog_tests
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/b8a205486ed5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 14:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args Jerome Marchand
2025-06-19 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jerome Marchand
2025-06-19 17:32 ` Yonghong Song
2025-06-19 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Convert test_sysctl to prog_tests Jerome Marchand
2025-06-19 17:33 ` Yonghong Song
2025-06-24 5:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175074120875.3399614.10605130442249512213.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.